Practice and Procedure -- Civil P.C. 1908, S.105 -- Challenge against interlocutory orders -- The legislative scheme does not oblige a party to challenge each and every interlocutory order at the stage at which it is made -- Unless a statute expressly mandates otherwise, such orders may be questioned in an appeal against the final decree.

Dipankar Datta,Augustine George Masih

Channappa v. Parvatewwa

9th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4057 (SC)

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, Ss.75A & 105 -- Contract Act 1872, S.73 -- Consumer Protection Act 2019, Ss.67 & 2(42) -- Consumer Protection Act 1986, S.2(1)(o) -- A bank receiving cheques for collection acts as an agent of the customer and is under an obligation to exercise due diligence in presenting the instruments within the prescribed validity period -- Failure to do so resulting in the instrument becoming stale, in the absence of any reasonable explanation, would result in negligence in the discharge of banking duties which would constitute deficiency in rendering service within the meaning of the consumer protection law.

B.V. Nagarathna,Ujjal Bhuyan

Canara Bank v. Kavita Chowdhary

15th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4049 (SC)

Constitution of India, Art.12 & Art.226 -- Co operative Societies Act 1965 (Rajasthan) -- Co operative Societies Act 2001 (Rajasthan), Ss.8 r/w Sch.B Cl.1(da), 8 r/w Sch.B Cl.1(i), 8 r/w Sch.B Cl.1(r) and 8 r/w Sch.B Cl.1(v), 11 & 28 -- The mere existence of regulatory or supervisory control, howsoever extensive, is not determinative; Such control must be of a degree that fundamentally alters the character of the body -- In the absence of such indicia disputes which are essentially private or internal in nature fall outside the ambit of judicial review under Article 226.

B.V. Nagarathna,R. Mahadevan

Ram Chandra Choudhary v. Roop Nagar Dugdh Utpadak Sahakari Samiti Ltd.

10th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4047 (SC)

Rent Act 1999 (Karnataka), Ss.27(b)(ii), 27(d)(i)(ii), 27(p) & 46 -- Section 46 empowers the High Court to examine the legality, correctness or propriety of an order; however, it does not confer appellate powers permitting reappreciation of evidence or substitution of factual findings.

Ahsanuddin Amanullah,R. Mahadevan

Ramachandrasa v. M/s. Mahendra Watch Company

10th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4054 (SC)

Service -- Public Services (Reservation For Economically Weaker Sections) Act 2020 (U.P), S.7 -- Constitution of India, Art.226 -- EWS category for appointment to the post of Health Worker (Female) -- Challenge to rejection of applications processed through computer applications/ software must not ordinarily be entertained as it could stall expeditious completion of the recruitment process thereby frustrating thousands and lacs of aspirants.

Manoj Misra,Prasanna B. Varale

Poonam Dwivedi v. State of U.P

10th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4051 (SC)

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, Ss.9,16 & 62 -- Appeal, framed and filed in the name of the corporate debtor by a suspended director claiming to be its authorised representative, is contrary to the mandate of the Code and there fore not maintainable -- Permitting it to be converted to an appeal by the suspended director at a later point of time, throwing the prescription of limitation to the winds, is a further violation of the Code.

P.V. Sanjay Kumar,K. Vinod Chandran

Nitendra Kumar Tomer, Suspended Director, Ambro Asia (P) Ltd. v. Unox S.P.A.

10th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4040 (SC)

P.V. Sanjay Kumar,R. Mahadevan

GLS Films Industries (P) Ltd. v. Chemical Suppliers India (P) Ltd.

9th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4044 (SC)

J.K. Maheshwari,Atul S. Chandurkar

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) v. Malpani

9th April, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4046 (SC)

Criminal P.C. 1973, S.482 -- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, S.528 -- The undertaking given before the High Court cannot be enforceable qua the proceedings in question as to enable the Single Judge to quash the proceedings straight-away without even issuing notice to the informant .

Manoj Misra,Manmohan

Suman Kumar Raghav v. Ravindra Kumar Sharma

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 4045 (SC)

Hindu Marriage Act 1955, S.13(1)(ia) & 13(1)(ib) -- The prolonged separation indicates that the matrimonial bond has broken down beyond repair and there is no possibility of resuming cohabitation.

Vikram Nath,Sandeep Mehta

Mamta Devi v. Sanjay Kumar

10th April, 2026

How can I help you today?

Latest Updates

Rent Act 1999 (Karnataka), Ss.27(b)(ii), 27(d)(i)(ii), 27(p) & 46 -- Section 46 empowers the High Court to examine the legality, correctness or propriety of an order; however, it does not confer appellate powers permitting reappreciation of evidence or substitution of factual findings.

Criminal P.C. 1973, S.482 -- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, S.528 -- The undertaking given before the High Court cannot be enforceable qua the proceedings in question as to enable the Single Judge to quash the proceedings straight-away without even issuing notice to the informant .

Hindu Marriage Act 1955, S.13(1)(ia) & 13(1)(ib) -- The prolonged separation indicates that the matrimonial bond has broken down beyond repair and there is no possibility of resuming cohabitation.