Administrative Law -- An authority cannot supplement or improve the reasons stated in the impugned order through affidavits.

P.M. Manoj

Kanjirappally Grama Panchayath v. State of Kerala

25th February, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1523 (SC)

Constitution of India, Art.226 -- Criminal P.C. 1973, S.482 -- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, S.528 -- Once a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and/or Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and/or Section 528 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is preferred, the same should be decided on merits, rather than dismissing the same as infructuous or by directing the Police to follow Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014 (3) KLT 143 (SC)).

Prashant Kumar Mishra,N.V. Anjaria

MD. Mashood v. State of U.P.

25th February, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1521 (SC)

Practice and Procedure – Legal aid – Notice to inform appellant of his counsel’s absence and appointment of amicus -- Assistance in the form of legal aid should be real and meaningful and not by way of a token gesture or to complete an idle formality -- None can possibly doubt the High Court’s genuine intention to render legal assistance to a non-appearing convict by appointing an amicus on his behalf to assist the court render justice but, perhaps, justice would have been better served if an intimation by way of a notice been sent.

Dipankar Datta,Satish Chandra Sharma

Bhola Mahto v. State of Jharkhand

16th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1515

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Ss.47 & 48 -- Constitution of India Art.22(1) -- In cases where the accused is a foreign national, compliance with Section 48 of the BNSS is fulfilled if the arrest and its grounds are communicated to the FRRO or the foreign national's Embassy/Consulate.

Kauser Edappagath

Abdul Hamid Makame v. State of Kerala

19th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1513

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Ss.34 & 37 -- The power exercised by the Appellate Court under Section 37 of the Act, 1996 is more restricted than the wide power exercised by the Court in deciding the application for setting aside of the Award under Section 34 of the Act, 1996.

Soumen Sen,Syam Kumar V.M.

Project Director, National Highways Authority of India v. Ahammed Ali

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1507 (SC)

Constitution of India, Arts.21 & 32 -- When the petitioners were performing their duties at the toll plaza resulting into a spat between the complainant and the employees of the toll plaza, denial of bail to the petitioners and the curtailment of their liberty for a period exceeding two months is absolutely unjustified and violative of the Fundamental Right of Liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India warranting exercise of the extraordinary writ jurisdiction conferred upon this Court by Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

Vikram Nath,Sandeep Mehta

Vishvjeet v. State of Uttar Pradesh

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1489

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, S.94 -- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985, Ss.67 -- Only a document or a thing, which is in the possession of a person from whom it is sought to be summoned, can be directed to be produced -- The person cannot be expected to create a document or thing to be furnished to the Investigating Agency.

C.S. Dias

Deputy Commissioner of Customs v. State of Kerala

10th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1504

State Information Commission (Procedure for Appeal) Rules 2006 (Kerala), R.7 -- Right to Information Act 2005, S.20 -- Appearance of the ‘appellant’ before the State Information Commission is optional -- Even if the appellant opts not to be present, the State Information Commission has to dispose of the appeal as per the provisions of the RTI Act.

Murali Purushothaman

Raisa Eapen v. State of Kerala

9th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1498

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, S.430 -- Criminal P.C. 1973, S.389 -- Suspension of Conviction -- Parameters Explained.

C. Jayachandran

Antony Raju v. State of Kerala

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1499

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, S.9 -- The proof of actual attempts to deal with, remove or dispose of the property with a view to defeat or delay the realisation of an impending arbitral award is not imperative for the grant of relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act -- A strong possibility of diminution of assets would suffice.

Soumen Sen,Syam Kumar V.M.

E.D. and F. Man Liquid Products Italia SRL. v. EMIL Traders (P) Ltd

10th March, 2026

How can I help you today?

Latest Updates

Administrative Law -- An authority cannot supplement or improve the reasons stated in the impugned order through affidavits.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Ss.47 & 48 -- Constitution of India Art.22(1) -- In cases where the accused is a foreign national, compliance with Section 48 of the BNSS is fulfilled if the arrest and its grounds are communicated to the FRRO or the foreign national's Embassy/Consulate.

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Ss.34 & 37 -- The power exercised by the Appellate Court under Section 37 of the Act, 1996 is more restricted than the wide power exercised by the Court in deciding the application for setting aside of the Award under Section 34 of the Act, 1996.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, S.430 -- Criminal P.C. 1973, S.389 -- Suspension of Conviction -- Parameters Explained.