How can I help you today?

Search Tip
Latest Updates

2026 KLT OnLine 1515

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Ss.47 & 48 -- Constitution of India Art.22(1) -- In cases where the accused is a foreign national, compliance with Section 48 of the BNSS is fulfilled if the arrest and its grounds are communicated to the FRRO or the foreign national's Embassy/Consulate.

Kauser Edappagath

Abdul Hamid Makame v. State of Kerala

19th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1513

Soumen Sen,Syam Kumar V.M.

Project Director, National Highways Authority of India v. Ahammed Ali

17th March, 2024

2026 KLT OnLine 1507

Constitution of India, Arts.21 & 32 -- When the petitioners were performing their duties at the toll plaza resulting into a spat between the complainant and the employees of the toll plaza, denial of bail to the petitioners and the curtailment of their liberty for a period exceeding two months is absolutely unjustified and violative of the Fundamental Right of Liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India warranting exercise of the extraordinary writ jurisdiction conferred upon this Court by Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

Vikram Nath,Sandeep Mehta

Vishvjeet v. State of Uttar Pradesh

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1489

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, S.94 -- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985, Ss.67 -- Only a document or a thing, which is in the possession of a person from whom it is sought to be summoned, can be directed to be produced -- The person cannot be expected to create a document or thing to be furnished to the Investigating Agency.

C.S. Dias

Deputy Commissioner of Customs v. State of Kerala

10th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1504

State Information Commission (Procedure for Appeal) Rules 2006 (Kerala), R.7 -- Right to Information Act 2005, S.20 -- Appearance of the ‘appellant’ before the State Information Commission is optional -- Even if the appellant opts not to be present, the State Information Commission has to dispose of the appeal as per the provisions of the RTI Act. 

Murali Purushothaman

Raisa Eapen v. State of Kerala

9th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1498

C. Jayachandran

Antony Raju v. State of Kerala

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1499

Soumen Sen,Syam Kumar V.M.

E.D. and F. Man Liquid Products Italia SRL. v. EMIL Traders (P) Ltd

10th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1500 (SC)

J.B. Pardiwala,K.V. Viswanathan

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Terrascope Ventures Ltd.

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1501 (SC)

J.B. Pardiwala,R. Mahadevan

Hamsaanandini Nanduri v. Union of India

17th March, 2026

2026 KLT OnLine 1491 (SC)

Service -- The enhanced ratio of 40% available to Anganwadi Workers enmasse, as has been asserted by the State is only to ensure that 11 % vacancies are clearly demarcated for the candidates having higher qualification and it was not the intention to exclude the degree holders from the ratio of 29% available to SSLC qualified Anganwadi Workers with required experience.

P.V. Sanjay Kumar,K. Vinod Chandran

Shiny v. Shalini Sreenivasan

16th March, 2026